Orchestrivo vs Dust: Which is best for you?
Dust builds conversational agents for knowledge work. Orchestrivo is an agent platform for your whole business.
What Orchestrivo does that Dust can't
Agents that build their own skills and triggers
Orchestrivo agents can create new reusable skills and set their own triggers mid-conversation.
Agents and agentic workflows
Orchestrivo has agents and workflows that can call each other. Anything that's a mix of deterministic steps and reasoning can run end-to-end on one platform.
White-labeled Slack agents
With Orchestrivo, your team can have multiple white-labeled Slack agents, each with a custom name, avatar, and per-app scoping. On Enterprise plans, agents shared with your organization can serve your entire Slack workspace, including teammates without a Orchestrivo account.
Custom MCP integrations authored in natural language
In Orchestrivo, you can create a custom MCP integration with a prompt. Deploy custom MCP integrations inside your VPC and govern them with Orchestrivo Controls.
VPC deployment with AI proxy and BYOK
For enterprises that want to keep their data in their own cloud, Orchestrivo supports VPC deployment in any region, AI proxy routing, and BYOK.
Governance at the tool level
Orchestrivo offers per-tool RBAC and natural language audit queries across every tool call in the entire org.
Orchestrivo vs. Dust
Both Orchestrivo and Dust are AI agent platforms. Here's how they differ when the agent has to actually run the work.
 Dust | ||
|---|---|---|
| Platform and ease of use | ||
| Platform and ease of use | ||
| Prebuilt integrations | ||
| 300+ | 55+ | |
| Agents | ||
| Workflows | ||
| Forms / interfaces | ||
| Webhook triggers | ||
| Scheduled triggers | ||
| Code execution in managed sandboxes | ||
| White-labeled per-team Slack agents | ||
| Hosting of custom MCP servers | ||
| AI capabilities | ||
| AI capabilities | ||
| Build agents with natural language | ||
| Agents can create shareable files | ||
| Agents can create their own skills, triggers, and workflows | ||
| Bring your own key (BYOK) | ||
| AI proxy routing | ||
| Allow/deny lists for AI models | ||
| Automatic model fallbacks | ||
| Automatic model routing per message, based on the task (Auto mode) | ||
| Email inboxes for agents | ||
| Sub-agent support | ||
| Live MCP-powered artifacts | ||
| Password-protected artifacts on your own domain | ||
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing | ||
| Major AI models included in subscription | ||
| Per-API-key spend caps | ||
| Premium enrichment tools included (Apollo, Exa, Firecrawl, DataForSEO, etc.) | ||
| Security, compliance, and governance | ||
| Security, compliance, and governance | ||
| SOC 2 Type II | ||
| Zero Data Retention | ||
| Virtual private cloud deployment | ||
| Per-tool RBAC inside agent execution | ||
| Per-document permission enforcement on indexed data | ||
| Conversational analytics agent | ||
| Per-user / -agent / -service audit traces | ||
| Connector Policies for agent control | ||
| Agent-agnostic MCP tool tracing | ||
| Tracing of proxied MCP servers | ||
| Support and enablement | ||
| Support and enablement | ||
| Dedicated CSM and solution architect (on enterprise) | ||
| On-site enablement (on enterprise) | ||
| Admin-approved template management | ||
Why teams choose Orchestrivo over Dust
Orchestrate multi-agentic workflows
Orchestrivo supports both, and you can even orchestrate complex processes with multiple agents inside workflows. Dust is agent-only, so deterministic business processes have to live in a separate tool.
Agents in Slack, email, and the tools your teams live in
Dust gives every Slack workspace one @Dust. With Orchestrivo, you can deploy multiple white-labeled Slack agents, each for a different team, and each with its own identity, tools, and permissions. Extend the same agent to email, and turn any channel or inbox into a workflow trigger.
Control every credential and observe every tool call
Orchestrivo vs. Dust
Ready to build AI-native automations?
Get started with Orchestrivo in minutes.